---
title: "Digital Credit Dashboard"
author: "True North Research"
author_url: "https://tnorth.com/crew/true-north-research/"
publisher: "True North"
publisher_url: "https://tnorth.com"
canonical_url: "https://tnorth.com/digital-credit/dashboard/"
markdown_url: "https://tnorth.com/digital-credit/dashboard.md"
date_published: "2026-03-24"
date_updated: "2026-03-24"
rendered_at: "2026-05-02T14:13:20.458Z"
section: "digital-credit"
tickers: []
instruments: []
asset_class: "perpetual-preferred-equity-bitcoin-backed"
word_count: 685
reading_time_minutes: 3
license: "© 2026 True North. Cite with attribution and a link to the canonical URL. Not investment advice."
disclosure: "True North is operated by Strive, Inc. Independent contributor content published under https://tnorth.com/legal/independent-discussion/."
tldr_generated: true
---

# Digital Credit Dashboard

> **TL;DR.** Live digital credit market data. Instrument prices, yields, coverage ratios, and BTC treasury metrics. Methodology-backed analytics from True North.
> — True North Research, True North (https://tnorth.com/digital-credit/dashboard/)

## What the digital credit dashboard is and why it exists

The digital credit dashboard is True North's reference page for preferred equity issued by Bitcoin treasury companies. It exists because the category now sits between several silos — public equity, fixed income, convertibles, and digital asset credit — and no established data provider covers it as a discrete market. Institutional users building positions in STRC, STRF, SATA, and their peers have had to assemble the picture manually, instrument by instrument, filing by filing.

A preferred issued by a Bitcoin treasury company is not just a dividend stream. Its risk sits inside an operating company, above common equity, and against a balance sheet whose asset mix matters. Simple screeners flatten those dimensions. This dashboard helps investors and issuers judge whether a stated yield is compensation for duration, subordination, volatility, optionality, or issuer-specific BTC exposure — and it does so against the same live prices the market is pricing off of right now.

## What the dashboard tracks

Coverage spans six listed instruments across two issuers. Strategy's preferred stack — STRF, STRC, STRE, STRK, and STRD — and SATA, the preferred equity issued by Strive, Inc. Each instrument differs in dividend type, cumulative treatment, payment frequency, convertibility, and denomination. The dashboard preserves those distinctions rather than averaging them out.

Metrics are organized around the questions an analyst actually asks. Effective yield, premium or discount to par, and yield spread versus the 10-year Treasury establish relative value. Tax-equivalent yield normalizes across investor tax profiles. Thirty-day volatility frames risk. Capital structure shows where each preferred sits in its issuer's claim hierarchy, and BTC coverage expresses how much Bitcoin stands behind the aggregate preferred stack. BTC coverage is not a slogan metric. It is a credit lens on residual asset support.

Issuance matters as much as structure. ATM history, the forward dividend schedule, and aggregate preferred market growth show whether supply is stable, expanding, or changing the economics of the stack over time. Coverage is evaluated by issuer, not by instrument in isolation — Strategy's five preferreds share a common asset pool and move together; SATA is evaluated against Strive's separate balance sheet.

## Who the dashboard is for

Capital allocators use it to screen Bitcoin treasury preferred stock against traditional high-yield credit and cash alternatives. The question is whether spread is real structural compensation or misread complexity, and whether the yield profile fits the mandate.

Corporate treasurers use the same data from the other side of the table. If a company is evaluating its own preferred issuance, it needs a view of where existing securities clear, how dividend structures are being priced, and how the market is treating cumulative, variable-rate, and convertible paper. The relevant question is not just cost of capital. It is cost of capital relative to structure, ranking, and balance-sheet optics.

Digital credit analysts and traders use the dashboard operationally — how STRC and SATA trade around monthly dividends, how preferreds reprice when BTC moves, how capital structure gaps open and close, and whether ATM activity shifts secondary market behavior. For that audience, the dashboard is a monitoring tool, not a marketing page.

## How True North approaches digital credit

True North treats digital credit as a credit problem first. The [methodology](/digital-credit/methodology/) is built on primary sources: SEC filings, exchange data, issuer disclosures, benchmark rate inputs, and official dividend declarations. Security terms are separated from issuer narrative, and comparable definitions are preferred over promotional labels. Data is cited inline and calculations are reproducible — we show our work, and corrections are logged on the methodology page.

That matters in a market where structure can look familiar while risk does not. True North is wholly owned by Strive, Inc., the issuer of SATA. The same analytical standard applies across every tracked instrument regardless of issuer, and conflicts are disclosed on-page. Editorial independence is not a disclosure — it is the premise of the work.

*This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security. Review all offering documents on [SEC EDGAR](https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar) before investing.*

## About this document

Canonical HTML: https://tnorth.com/digital-credit/dashboard/
Site-wide AI index: https://tnorth.com/llms.txt